The rubric

Judging & scoring

Every entry is scored out of 100 against the same nine criteria. AI assesses each criterion from your structured answers and evidence and records a rationale; the awards panel reviews and confirms every result before release. Criteria without supporting evidence are capped, so verifiable submissions score higher.

Quality of construction & workmanship

Finish quality, defect and snag performance, QA/QC discipline and durability of the delivered work.

Evidence: Photos, 60-second walkthrough video, defect closure rate, QA/QC records

20%

Speed of construction

Delivered output rate against a realistic benchmark for the building type and scale.

Evidence: Contract vs actual duration, floor cycle time or output per month

12%

On-time or early completion

Actual handover measured against the contract completion date, net of granted extensions of time.

Evidence: Contract completion date, actual handover / CPC date, EOT record

13%

Cost & commercial control

Final account discipline, variation control and commercial transparency with the client.

Evidence: Contract sum vs final account, variation value, claims record

10%

Safety & wellbeing

Incident performance per man-hour, safety leadership and worker welfare standards.

Evidence: LTIFR, man-hours worked, incident log, training hours, welfare provisions

12%

Technical complexity & problem solving

Difficulty of the work and the quality of engineering and site solutions applied.

Evidence: Written response, method statements, photos of the solution in place

10%

Sustainability & environmental impact

Measured environmental performance: certification, materials, waste and energy.

Evidence: Green certification, waste diversion %, embodied carbon or energy data

10%

Client satisfaction & stakeholder outcome

Verified client view of the delivery experience and the outcome handed over.

Evidence: Client reference letter or scored client survey

8%

Innovation, digital & workforce development

Digital delivery, modern methods and investment in local capability.

Evidence: BIM/technology use, modular methods, training and local hiring data

5%

Tier thresholds

Platinum

87+

Regional benchmark performance across every criterion.

Gold

80+

Outstanding delivery with clear evidence.

Silver

70+

Strong, well-evidenced performance.

Certificate of Participation

60+

60–69: recognised participation below the award threshold.

Special recognition

Alongside category results, the highest-scoring entries on individual criteria receive special recognition certificates for Quality of Construction & Workmanship, Speed of Construction, and On-Time or Early Completion. These are drawn from the same scores, so no separate entry is required.

Scored against this rubric

Put your project in front of the panel

Pick a category, submit your evidence online and receive a verified 0-100 score with a criterion-by-criterion breakdown.